{"id":1083,"date":"2010-11-24T05:00:03","date_gmt":"2010-11-24T11:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/?p=1083"},"modified":"2022-11-28T15:43:31","modified_gmt":"2022-11-28T21:43:31","slug":"galatians-57-12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/?p=1083","title":{"rendered":"Galatians 5:7-12"},"content":{"rendered":"

7 You ran well. Who hindered you from obeying the truth?<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

8 This persuasion does not come from Him who calls you.<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

9 A little leaven leavens the whole lump.<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

10 I have confidence in you, in the Lord, that you will have no other mind; but he who troubles you shall bear his judgment, whoever he is. <\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

11 And I, brethren, if I still preach circumcision, why do I still suffer persecution? Then the offense of the cross has ceased.<\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

12 I could wish that those who trouble you would even cut themselves off! <\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n

hindered (v.7) \u2014 cut off, break up, cutting in on, slowing down a runner in a race. Who broke up the road you had begun to travel so well?<\/h3>\n

obeying (v.7) = persuaded, won over. Obedience resulting from persuasion, not from submission<\/h3>\n

persuasion (v.8) \u2014 influence (of the Judaizers)<\/h3>\n

Him who calls you (v.8) \u2014 God<\/h3>\n

So … You weren’t persuaded by the truth but\u00a0 you are persuaded by those who hinder you, who do not come from God.<\/h3>\n

Leaven (v.9) \u2014 the pervasive power of evil. One person in an assembly can persuade all to follow a wrong path \u2014 or \u2014 One bit of law allowed can send a person down the wrong path. Leaven is always a symbol of evil in the Bible.<\/h3>\n

I have confidence (v.10) \u2014 Paul had hope based on his argument and the power of the Lord, that the Galatians would resist the influence of the Judaizers.<\/h3>\n

in the Lord (v.10) \u2014 Paul’s confidence wasn’t in the Galatians but in the Lord, that He would accomplish His purpose in them.<\/h3>\n

other mind (v.10) \u2014 to form an opinion and take action upon it.<\/h3>\n

bear his judgment (v.10) \u2014 burden with the decision resulting from judgment<\/h3>\n

whoever he is (v.10) \u2014 no matter the troublemaker’s authority or position (James?)<\/h3>\n

if I still preach circumcision (v.11) \u2014 Paul is meeting a charge of inconsistency or insincerity by the Judaizers (1:6-9<\/span><\/a>)<\/h3>\n

The apostle turns suddenly to meet a charge of inconsistency, perhaps of insincerity, made against him by the Judaizing party, one to which indeed he had already somewhat indirectly referred (1:8-9). His action in regard to Timothy may have afforded ground for this charge. But the case of Timothy differed from that of Titus (2:3<\/span><\/a>) in an important particular. Titus was a Gentile born of Gentile parents; Timothy’s mother was a Hebrew, his father a Gentile\u2014he was therefore the offspring of a union plainly prohibited by the Mosaic Law. It may have seemed expedient to the apostle on this account to circumcise Timothy in order to conciliate some who through ignorance, or through weakness in the faith, were sensitive on the point. However that may have been, the apostle soon learned that any attempt to conciliate the Judaizers was foredoomed to failure, and would probably involve the church in disaster. The time arrived when it became necessary to oppose them at all points, and to attack their hybrid system of salvation by works and faith with every legitimate weapon available. The pressure in favor of circumcision was renewed when Titus came to Antioch, but now the apostle did not yield. So long as he hoped to further the interests of the gospel by conciliating the Judaizers he endeavored to conciliate them, perhaps even hoped to win them; now he saw clearly that these interests could be preserved and furthered only by bold and insistent attack upon those who opposed them.\u00a0 \u2014 Vine, page 237-238<\/span><\/h3>\n

still (v.11) \u2014 (1st use) a thing that formerly went on but has been changed.<\/h3>\n

still (v.11) \u2014 (2nd use) logical opposition to a point<\/h3>\n

why do I still suffer persecution (v.11) \u2014 If, as the Judaizers claimed, Paul was preaching circumcision, then why would they, who also preached it, persecute him?<\/h3>\n

offense (v.11) \u2014 stumbling block \u2014 part of a trap to which bait is attached \u2014 metaphorically, anything that causes another to fall (but not always in a bad way \u2014 the hindrance can be good which causes the wicked to fall)<\/h3>\n

Chrysostom commenting on this same thing said, “For even the cross which was a stumbling block to the Jews, was not so much so as the failure to require obedience to ancestral laws. For when they attacked Stephen they said not that he was worshiping the Crucified, but that he was speaking against the law and the holy place.” Saul, the Pharisee, persecuted the Church for the same reason (1:13-14<\/span><\/a>). The Cross was offensive to the Jew therefore because it set aside the entire Mosaic economy, and because it offered salvation by grace through faith alone without the added factor of works performed by the sinner in an effort to merit the salvation offered. All of which goes to show that the Jew of the first century had an erroneous conception of the law of Moses, for that system never taught that a sinner was accepted by God on the basis of good works.\u00a0 \u2014 Wuest, page 146.<\/span><\/h3>\n

offense of the cross (v.11) \u2014 If Paul’s gospel of the cross and what it meant, was identical with what the Judaizers were saying, they would have no issue with it and wouldn’t be opposing Paul.<\/h3>\n

All his labors, his sufferings, and his distresses could be traced to his fidelity to the gospel of Christ and to his insistence upon justification by faith in Him alone. “Then hath the stumbling-block of the cross been done away,” adds the apostle. If, indeed, man can be saved by rites and ceremonies, then there is no need of the death of Christ. This painful and ignominious death had been a stumblingblock in the way of the Jews. If now salvation depended on Jewish rites and ceremonies, then this stumblingblock no longer remained. It is, indeed, a fact that at the foot of the cross we realize the\u00a0 weakness and impotence and worthlessness of our own deeds of righteousness, our own efforts to secure salvation. “For if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died for nought.” \u2014 Erdman, page 104.<\/span><\/h3>\n

I could wish (v.12) = “would that” \u2014 an exclamation<\/h3>\n

those who trouble you (v.12) \u2014 continuous tense \u2014 “are attempting to unsettle you.”<\/h3>\n

cut themselves off (v.12) \u2014 amputate<\/h3>\n

The words cut off<\/em> are from apokopto<\/em>. The word refers to bodily mutilation. Paul expresses the wish that the Judaizers would not stop with circumcision, but would go on to emasculation. The town of Pessinus was the home of the worship of Cybele in honor of whom bodily mutilation was practiced. The priests of Cybele castrated themselves. This was a recognized form of heathen self-devotion to the god and would not be shunned in ordinary conversation. This explains the freedom with which Paul speaks of it to his Galatian converts. In Philippians 3:2<\/span><\/a>, the apostle speaks of the Judaizers as the concision, that is, those who mutilate themselves. Vincent <\/em>expresses his conception of Paul’s words as follows: “These people are disturbing\u00a0 you by insisting on circumcision. I would that they would make thorough work of it in their own case, and instead of merely amputating the foreskin, would castrate themselves as heathen priests do. Perhaps this would be even more powerful help to salvation.” \u2014 Wuest, page 146-147.<\/span><\/h3>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

7 You ran well. Who hindered you from obeying the truth? 8 This persuasion does not come from Him who calls you. 9 A little leaven leavens the whole lump. 10 I have confidence in you, in the Lord, that … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-verse-study-galatians"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1083"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7178,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1083\/revisions\/7178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/versebyverse.carpelibra.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}